People Smartz Blog

It is becoming more and more apparent, that no matter how small your business is, you can not avoid your obligations in regards to meeting your employer obligations.

Many thanks to our great friends at Brands Law for this great example of the line of thinking to which our courts are dealing with breaches of the Fair Work Act:

"Back in April 2011, in a case involving underpayment of penalty rates to employees, Magistrate Hawkins said there was a need to "send a message to the community at large and small employers particularly, that the correct entitlements for employees must be paid and that steps must be taken by employers (of all sizes) to ascertain and comply with minimum entitlements (as opposed to ignoring those obligations).

"Compliance should not be seen as the bastion of the large employers with human resources staff and advisory consultants (accountants, consultants, lawyers) behind them"."

In a speech in May 2011, the Fair Work Ombudsman made a point that it "was not sufficient for companies to turn a blind eye and hope that they are meeting their obligations".  He particularly made the point that companies need to make sure that they are resourcing their obligations appropriately.

With this type of language coming from our courts and the Ombudsman, it is very evident and important that all businesses, regardless of size have in place a system for ensuring compliance with their awards, the Fair Work Act and the National Employment Standards.

Our experience with small to medium sized businesses has shown that business people are finding it more and more difficult to manage these obligations.  As we have said in our blog posts before - the system itself is not built for small business.

Unfortunately, it appears that the message from our courts is that small businesses need to manage their obligations similarly to the way they would be handled in big business.  However, small businesses do not have the human resources staff etc to do that!

Understanding your obligations can be difficult and managing them can be time consuming. The place to start is to ensure you are compliant now!

Why not book one of our People and Business Reviews where we can help you identify the actions you can take to ensure you are meeting your obligations.

Book your review today!

Fair Work Australia has published their decision varying the General Retail Award 2010 to allow casual school aged workers to work shifts shorter than 3 hours.

The award has been varied as follows:

Clause 13.4 is varied by the addition of the following words at the end of the clause:

“provided that the minimum engagement period for an employee will be one hour and 30 minutes if all of the following circumstances apply:

(a) the employee is a full time secondary school student; and

(b) the employee is engaged to work between the hours of 3.00 pm and 6.30 pm on a day which they are required to attend school; and

(c) the employee agrees to work, and a parent or guardian of the employee agrees to allow the employee to work, a shorter period than three hours; and

(d) employment for a longer period than the period of the engagement is not possible either because of the operational requirements of the employer or the unavailability of the employee.

As we have stated in a previous blog post (Common Sense at Last! After School Work Back on the Agenda for Teenagers), we believe that this decision is a win for common sense by Fair Work Australia.  It is a pity that it has taken so long, and a needless appeal to make it happen!

To download the determination, download the Determination from Fair Work Australia

Last financial year, the Fair Work Ombudsman commenced prosecutions against in excess of 50 companies for underpayment of wages and entitlements to their employees.

The simple fact is that this number is just the tip of the iceberg.  Many other employers have had to backpay employees as a result of underpayment.  Just check out the Ombudsman's media release page (Fair Work Ombudsman - Media Releases) and you will see the number of press releases on the subject.

Late last year, we worked with a business that had been underpaying their employees over a long period. By the end of the process, they had back paid their employees nearly $100,000 - quite a hit on a small business!

Now, this situation was one where they had innocently made an error in calculating a 40 hour week. The Ombudsman recognised this and no further action was taken.  However, there have been fines handed out to businesses and Directors where the Ombudsman found that taking further action was appropriate.

One example of a company based fine was where a franchisee from a major franchise group was fined $150,000 for underpaying staff.  Directors have also been targeted, with a recent prosecution fining individual directors a total of in excess of $130,000 for underpaying 47 staff.

Under the current system of Modern Awards and Transitional Arrangements, calculating how much you need to pay your employees can be confusing.  However, it is important to recognise that confusion, or not understanding your commitments is not an excuse for underpaying staff.  In the end, at best, you will be required to back pay them any entitlements they may have not received.

So what can you do to protect your business?  Well here are our recommended 5 Steps to Protect Your Business:

1. Understand and be compliant with the National Employment Standards.
2. Identify the modern awards and classifications that apply to your employees;
3. Make sure your employees receive compensation for actual hours worked, paying particular attention to ordinary hours of work, overtime and penalty rates, and shift allowances. 
4. Do you work a 40 hour week in your business?  Do you roll leave loading into a salary or hourly rate?  These type of arrangements (and others) come under the heading of "Award Flexibility" and you are required to ensure your employees are "Better Off Overall".   If you do not understand the requirements around Award Flexibility - seek advice. 
5. Make sure you keep the right records!  If you are investigated, you will need to demonstrate compliance.  To do that your record keeping will need to be accurate and in accordance with the requirements.  

If you need assistance in any of the above areas - then give us a call!  At People Smartz, we are more than happy to assist you!

Contact Us

Did you know that 89% of employees in Australian Businesses were employed by companies employing 20 employees or less? (Australian Bureau of Statistics 8165.0 2010)

When you consider this statistic, you need to wonder why our industrial relations system is designed for 11% of the workforce!

It all comes down to some very important factors (in our opinion):

1. The employers of 11% of the workforce are bigger contributors to the political parties
2. The 11% of the workforce are the primary targets of our union movement; and,
3. The employers of 11% of the workforce are the major drivers of industry bodies supposedly in place to support business.

The HR Coach Research Institute has released its latest quarterly index.

The latest information coming out of the business sector indicates a significant drop in business confidence and a unique situation developing in terms of a two speed economy.  

The following summary is provided courtesy of the Institute:

"Alarmingly, this data was compiled before any firm Carbon Tax plan was released by the federal government, thus does not account for the affects of the proposed tax. In light of this, confidence and sentiment in the business sector will most probably not improve in the coming quarter.

Furthermore, job advertisements fell, as did job creation in the past quarter.

The multi-speed economy in Australia is presenting the business sector with the unique situation that has the economy growing whilst at the same time making business owners retreat into survival mode. As a result long term planning and strategy are suffering.

Interestingly employee satisfaction levels within the business sector are higher than those of business owner's satisfaction with their own business. This could exacerbate already strained relationships."

You can download a copy of this latest research from our website - HR Quarterly Index

It appears that we are finally starting to see some real pressure being put on the Opposition to provide a real policy difference between the parties in relation to industrial relations.  Even Heather Ridout, once a supporter of the Fair Work Act, has recognised the need for debate in this area

And it is about time too!

The Fair Work Act does not balance the playing field in industrial relations and is providing disincentives to small and medium sized businesses.  It is complex and a minefield for players in the game who do not have the time, resources or knowledge to manage it.

At People Smartz we work predominantly with businesses who do not have a Human Resources team, they do not have experience in interpreting the awards and they do not have the time to understand all the complex points of the different areas of the law.

Only last week I conducted a review for a small business person.  His business was operating well and, as far as he was concerned, was compliant with the award and legislation.  However, by the time the National Employment Standards, the Modern Awards, the transitional arrangements and the difference between state and federal jurisdiction had been explained to him his comment was "how am I supposed to keep up and understand all this!"

This particular gentlemen was not working with his staff compliantly and needs to make changes to his employment arrangements.  Due to the changes between state and federal coverage, he had missed several important points of coverage, because of transitional arrangements he had missed increases in minimum wages, because of a lack of understanding of the National Employment Standards he was underpaying staff in accordance with the "Better Off Overall Test".

He is not alone.  We see small and medium sized businesses every week who are in some way not meeting the minimum entitlements under this legislation.  And it is important to note that this is because they don't understand the requirements on them.

Over 80% of those employed in Australian businesses are employed within businesses that have less than 5 staff. These businesses are the real engine room of Australia's economy and they are woefully ignored by an industrial relations system which is not designed to help or support them. Nor have we seen any real effort to provide them with the education they so badly need. 

Since 2005 we have had two pieces of legislation that have led the industrial relations debate - Work Choices and the Fair Work Act.  In my opinion, each of them has taken the debate to the extreme left or right in an effort to either decrease or increase the power of unions within the Australian political and industrial relations arena.  Their underlying aim has not been the development of any "fair and equitable" system, nor have they been designed with the primary aim of benefiting the Australian Economy. Their real and underlying focus was on union power.

It is time that we moved this debate along, the opposition needs to move on and start challenging the inadequate aspects of the current legislation and bring the discussion back to developing a system designed for all Australians and that can support all Australian businesses.  The Opposition needs to stop treating this as a "no-go" area, forget Work Choices and begin encouraging real debate in this area.

It is only through real debate that we will see change - thank god, we are beginning to see some movement in that direction.  
 

With Queensland in the midst of one of the great natural disasters, nearly every business we are speaking to is effected in some way. Some are under water, or commencing the clean up after being under water, others are not but have staff and team members effected.  This scale of this is just incredible.  Our thoughts are with each and everyone of you.

Over the last couple of days we have begun receiving queries about issues regarding employment and the floods.  If you would like information on employment issues such as leave, standing down employees etc, visit our Queensland Floods page.

We have also created a forum topic where people can go to ask questions - The People Smartz Forum.  It you have any questions regarding employment and the floods, feel free to post them so everyone can see.

The unions last week began a push to enable casual employees to transfer to permanent employment.

The plan proposed by the unions would require employers to make casual employees permanent after 12 months.  There was also some discussion in the plan about governments “favoring’ companies with majority permanent workforces in the awarding of contracts. The unions believe such an approach is necessary to tackle “precarious employment”.

Business groups were not happy (as you would expect) claiming that such moves would drive companies “to the wall”.  They called the approach a “misguided view of the jobs sector” and said “it doesn’t relate to the modern-day Australian economy, which is dominated by the services sector”.

We gave had such rules before.  In 2004/5, rules where “regular and systematic” casual employees were allowed to request part time employment were introduced.  We had a similar “hue and cry” then!

From my experience, very few casual employees wanted to take up the opportunity.  Australian workers generally understand the difference between casual and permanent employment and are often loath to let go of the 20-25% loading for casual employment. 

Casual employment is designed to allow an employer to handle the peaks and troughs of their business.  Casual employment contains no guarantees and no expectations of employment beyond the end of the current shift.  In its purest form, it is “call and come to work”.  Because there are no guarantees or expectations of future work, a loading is paid to compensate for the lack of annual leave, sick leave etc etc.

But the needs of the business often necessitate rostering casuals for work, sometimes weeks in advance.  Overtime, this leads to businesses adopting rostering systems which virtually “guarantee” work to a casual.  Basically, the employment becomes “regular and systematic”.  When work becomes regular and systematic, the question needs to be asked – are they really casuals?

This is the point behind the unions push.  If a person is employed as a casual but doing regular shifts and systematic work then they should receive the entitlements of permanent employees because in practice, that is what they are.

Whether you agree or don’t agree with the unions, there are many advantages to creating a permanent workforce in your business.  A guarantee of employment encourages commitment and develops “ownership” in the role.  Accountability is easier to assign to someone whose employment is guaranteed and your ability to develop consistent behaviors’ is improved.

Many businesses I deal with argue that putting on permanent staff “takes away the flexibility” from their business.  For some businesses this may be true, and for them, I would not recommend such a measure providing the employment they were offering was not “regular and systematic”.

Another argument I often hear is that it is too expensive to have permanent employees.  Well, the fact is that in the long run it is probably cheaper!  While you need to accrue leave etc, you will not be paying the 20-25% loading and your productivity will most probably improve.  The reality is that it often has nothing to do with “cost” but more to do with “ease” – it is easier to pay everything out with a 20-25% loading than have to “accrue”.

The ease of “getting rid” of casual employees is also stated as a reason for keeping people as casuals.  However, the reality is that if they are regular and systematic in their employment, the unfair dismissal rules will most probably apply – the end result being that this argument is flawed in its execution!

For any workforce, permanent or casual, I recommend you sit down and work out the number of hours being worked in your business.  Is there a constant number of hours worked in each week?  This is the first step in working out whether you can (or should) put permanent employees in place.  If you can, casual employees can then be used to handle the peaks and troughs – not for the constant hours.

If you must have casuals in your business, then think seriously about how you work with them.  Do you roster them in a regular and systematic way?  Do you need to do this?  Can you do it any other way?  In other words – do some workforce planning!

Would you like to know more about how you can improve the use of people in your business?  At People Smartz, we assist businesses in planning for the most efficient and effective use of their workforce.  We work with you to ensure that you are using your most important resource in a manner which leads to success for you, your business and your team.   Call us today!   

Recently, the Parliamentary Secretary for School Education and Workplace Relations said that the number of unfair dismissal claims under the Fair Work Act had increased.

She said the number of claims in the 12 months to June this year was 10,751.  This is significantly up from 2008-2009 where a total of 7,994 claims were made.

If you like talking in terms of percentages, this is a 35% increase in claims.

Significantly, she also said that “83% of claims” were resolved through conciliation.  She used this as evidence that the new system was “working”. 

I am seeing clients weekly who are becoming more concerned about the effects of the new laws and the ease of making an unfair dismissal claim. For them, the figure of “83% of claims” is evidence that the system is “not working”.

They are hearing stories of businesses paying “go away” money to make these claims go away – regardless of the validity of the claim.

Now, there has to be some protection for employees against unfair dismissal – I don’t think anyone will argue with me on that. Laws of the type we have now work better in the corporate environment, and largely that is where their designed for use (I will not argue whether they “work” in the corporate environment – that is another issue).  In smaller businesses however, a different set of circumstances are at work.

First, SME’s normally do not have access to HR Teams or the systems in place to manage problem situations.  Normally they are handled from gut instinct or based on a small amount of experience.   Often that experience is under previous industrial relations regimes and not necessarily relevant to the current circumstances.

Second - Without having the systems in place, the business owner and the employee are often directly affected by the complexity of the new laws.  The majority of small business owners I have spoken to have never heard of the “Fair Dismissal Code for Small Businesses” and have very little idea about the steps they need to take to protect their business – and themselves.

I regularly receive calls from businesses that are having problems with employees.  Because they do not have formal processes in place, they are concerned that their actions may result in a complaint or claim against them.  The regularity of these calls is increasing.  Another example of this is the increasing number of businesses approaching People Smartz to request assistance with putting in place systems to protect their business – this has increased by 22% since this time last year!

For the first time ever, we are also receiving calls from employees – asking how they go about making a claim!  Over the last month, we have received 12 such calls with another 5 queries through our website. All except one have revolved around perceived unfair treatment in the workplace or underpaid entitlements.

While this is good for our business, the fact is that small to medium sized businesses need education, a concentration on developing fair and equitable systems and assistance with developing productive and efficient workforces.  They do not need increased complexity, aggressive regulation and regulatory systems that encourage claims regardless of their validity. 

However, this is the regime that we have.  The Work Choices legislation has resulted in a polarization of the debate about the industrial relations system and we are unlikely to see a constructive debate about the system for awhile yet.  As a result, businesses need to work to develop the needed systems and infrastructure to ensure they are compliant.

People Smartz is ready to assist small to medium sized businesses to ensure they are compliant and protected.  We offer a number of services designed to review and inform businesses of the areas of risk in regards to the new legislation.  Why not start by booking your Human Resources Review of Your Business today!