People Smartz Blog

In October 2009, I wrote a blog article regarding the increasing risk businesses were putting themselves under when utilising independent contractors in their business.

This article was titled Independent Contractors - Benefit or Risk to Your Business? and you can read it again by clicking on the link - I strongly recommend you do.

An independent contractor is someone who is self-employed and contracts his or her services to clients - most often other businesses.

Unfortunately, over the years a number of employers have used this as an avenue to avoid their obligations to their employees in respect to things like accruals, superannuation and other entitlements.  These type of arrangements are called "Sham Contracts".

There has been a very strong push against Sham Contracting by the Fair Work Ombudsman over the last 12 months.  In particular, these investigations have revolved around three industries - cleaning, hair and beauty and call centres.

These audits found that 23% of businesses had "mis-classified" employees as independent contractors.  In other words - nearly a quarter of those companies audited were mis-classifying employees as independent contractors.

A recent experience of company I know is an example of how these laws can effect a business:

About this time last year, I met with a gentleman who had started a commercial cleaning company. Based on common practice in the industry, he had engaged a good number of independent contractors to service his growing client base.

Now, he had developed a business model designed around several main "objectives" including high cleaning standards, good quality cleaning products and a highly organised workforce.

The problem was that these "objectives" also defined the relationship he had with his "independent contractors".

Over the past 12 months, he has worked hard to grow his business.  During this time, he had also worked, with the aid of a specialist company, to set up his independent contractor arrangements and bring them within the requirements of the legislation.

During that period he has also been audited by the Fair Work Ombudsman and successfully negotiated their investigation.  

However, he was advised several weeks ago by the company assisting him that they could not continue to assist him (I should point out for very legitimate reasons with no fault on him or his company).

The result was that he could not continue to run his company on the model he had developed - utilising independent contractors.

He was faced with a choice - continue to operate with independent contractors and face potential issues with the law or move his team to an employment arrangement - given his experience with the Fair Work Ombudsman, he decided to abide by the law.

Unfortunately, when he spoke to his independent contractors, they were not willing to move to an employment relationship. 

This left him with only one option - to wind back his business to the point where the work could be handled by himself and his partner.

So the end result - a good number of people are now out of work, a number of businesses are now looking for a new cleaning company and a once thriving, growing business is now "diminishing" in size and operations.

This story highlights how the wrong employment structure can affect your business.  It was never the intention of the Fair Work Ombudsman's activities to create this situation - this is the result of having the wrong structure operating in the first place.

My recommendations from October 2010 still have a strong meaning now and I recommend you consider them in your business: 

"I strongly recommend to my clients before entering into independent contractors arrangements that they closely review the relationship they are forming.  While the benefits of utilising independent contractors are significant, if not structured properly, they also introduce an element of risk to the business."

People Smartz is able to assist businesses with the process of employing independent contractors.  If you have, or are considering, independent contractors in your business - contact us today.

Contact 

It is becoming more and more apparent, that no matter how small your business is, you can not avoid your obligations in regards to meeting your employer obligations.

Many thanks to our great friends at Brands Law for this great example of the line of thinking to which our courts are dealing with breaches of the Fair Work Act:

"Back in April 2011, in a case involving underpayment of penalty rates to employees, Magistrate Hawkins said there was a need to "send a message to the community at large and small employers particularly, that the correct entitlements for employees must be paid and that steps must be taken by employers (of all sizes) to ascertain and comply with minimum entitlements (as opposed to ignoring those obligations).

"Compliance should not be seen as the bastion of the large employers with human resources staff and advisory consultants (accountants, consultants, lawyers) behind them"."

In a speech in May 2011, the Fair Work Ombudsman made a point that it "was not sufficient for companies to turn a blind eye and hope that they are meeting their obligations".  He particularly made the point that companies need to make sure that they are resourcing their obligations appropriately.

With this type of language coming from our courts and the Ombudsman, it is very evident and important that all businesses, regardless of size have in place a system for ensuring compliance with their awards, the Fair Work Act and the National Employment Standards.

Our experience with small to medium sized businesses has shown that business people are finding it more and more difficult to manage these obligations.  As we have said in our blog posts before - the system itself is not built for small business.

Unfortunately, it appears that the message from our courts is that small businesses need to manage their obligations similarly to the way they would be handled in big business.  However, small businesses do not have the human resources staff etc to do that!

Understanding your obligations can be difficult and managing them can be time consuming. The place to start is to ensure you are compliant now!

Why not book one of our People and Business Reviews where we can help you identify the actions you can take to ensure you are meeting your obligations.

Book your review today!

Fair Work Australia has published their decision varying the General Retail Award 2010 to allow casual school aged workers to work shifts shorter than 3 hours.

The award has been varied as follows:

Clause 13.4 is varied by the addition of the following words at the end of the clause:

“provided that the minimum engagement period for an employee will be one hour and 30 minutes if all of the following circumstances apply:

(a) the employee is a full time secondary school student; and

(b) the employee is engaged to work between the hours of 3.00 pm and 6.30 pm on a day which they are required to attend school; and

(c) the employee agrees to work, and a parent or guardian of the employee agrees to allow the employee to work, a shorter period than three hours; and

(d) employment for a longer period than the period of the engagement is not possible either because of the operational requirements of the employer or the unavailability of the employee.

As we have stated in a previous blog post (Common Sense at Last! After School Work Back on the Agenda for Teenagers), we believe that this decision is a win for common sense by Fair Work Australia.  It is a pity that it has taken so long, and a needless appeal to make it happen!

To download the determination, download the Determination from Fair Work Australia

Last financial year, the Fair Work Ombudsman commenced prosecutions against in excess of 50 companies for underpayment of wages and entitlements to their employees.

The simple fact is that this number is just the tip of the iceberg.  Many other employers have had to backpay employees as a result of underpayment.  Just check out the Ombudsman's media release page (Fair Work Ombudsman - Media Releases) and you will see the number of press releases on the subject.

Late last year, we worked with a business that had been underpaying their employees over a long period. By the end of the process, they had back paid their employees nearly $100,000 - quite a hit on a small business!

Now, this situation was one where they had innocently made an error in calculating a 40 hour week. The Ombudsman recognised this and no further action was taken.  However, there have been fines handed out to businesses and Directors where the Ombudsman found that taking further action was appropriate.

One example of a company based fine was where a franchisee from a major franchise group was fined $150,000 for underpaying staff.  Directors have also been targeted, with a recent prosecution fining individual directors a total of in excess of $130,000 for underpaying 47 staff.

Under the current system of Modern Awards and Transitional Arrangements, calculating how much you need to pay your employees can be confusing.  However, it is important to recognise that confusion, or not understanding your commitments is not an excuse for underpaying staff.  In the end, at best, you will be required to back pay them any entitlements they may have not received.

So what can you do to protect your business?  Well here are our recommended 5 Steps to Protect Your Business:

1. Understand and be compliant with the National Employment Standards.
2. Identify the modern awards and classifications that apply to your employees;
3. Make sure your employees receive compensation for actual hours worked, paying particular attention to ordinary hours of work, overtime and penalty rates, and shift allowances. 
4. Do you work a 40 hour week in your business?  Do you roll leave loading into a salary or hourly rate?  These type of arrangements (and others) come under the heading of "Award Flexibility" and you are required to ensure your employees are "Better Off Overall".   If you do not understand the requirements around Award Flexibility - seek advice. 
5. Make sure you keep the right records!  If you are investigated, you will need to demonstrate compliance.  To do that your record keeping will need to be accurate and in accordance with the requirements.  

If you need assistance in any of the above areas - then give us a call!  At People Smartz, we are more than happy to assist you!

Contact Us

Today I was almost involved in an accident in my car.

I was driving along the road, the last of three cars travelling along a suburban street.  Up ahead was a side street with one car waiting to turn out and another waiting to turn into it.

Unexpectantly, the first of the two cars ahead of me suddenly stopped to let these two cars exit and enter the side street.

Taken by surprise, both I and the driver of the second car braked hard.  Unfortunately, the second car was unable to stop in time and drove straight into the rear of the first car, which then crashed into both the cars turning.  Luckily, I was travelling far enough behind to avoid being physically involved and my car was undamaged - something I can not say for the other 4 cars involved.  

More importantly, no one was injured in the accident.

Now what has this got to do with a blog about business you might ask?

Well, it teaches us a lesson in why it is important to manage expectations in your business - when you don't, the unexpected happens!

We have road laws that control how traffic behaves, signs that indicate who is required to give way or stop, speed limits and many other things that are provided to ensure we are safe and consistent on the road.  Today's accident occurred (in my opinion), because someone decided that they would do the "unexpected".

Simply, he stopped to allow traffic that legally did not have the right of way to turn.  As he stated after, he thought he was "doing the right thing" and that "they could be waiting for ages".  

The problem was that this was not a behaviour those travelling behind were expecting - we were expecting him to follow the rules.  He hadn't even thought that others would be expecting him to do something different!

Now we have said before in this blog that the number one thing we see when asked to assist businesses with issues that develop with people is that there is an inconsistent approach to expectation management.  

When expectations aren't clear or not understood, then problems occur.  In the case of the car accident, the expectations were clear, but the understanding was not - the driver did not understand the need to stick to rules, he did not understand the effect that his actions may have (I am sure he does now!)

So there is a lesson to be learnt from today's event - how you deliver and ensure understanding of your and your businesses expectations is important in ensuring your business remains on track - without any "accidents".

This is were tools such as position descriptions, employment agreements, codes of conduct, processes and procedures become very important.  They lay out the basic "expectations" of the business in regards to behaviours, customer and peer interaction, business development etc.  If these are clear and easily understood, you are a long way along the track to ensuring a smooth running business.

In line with this is ensuring that you have strong systems to communicate formally and informally with your team.  This includes performance management systems and the way you pass on important information.  Regardless of the size of the business, these systems in themselves can be designed to improve both individual and business performance.

Equally important is the demonstrated behaviour of owners and managers of your business. By ensuring your own actions are line with these expectations, you are providing an example to your team.

If you would like to improve the performance of your team, first look to how you manage your expectations - For many years, we at People Smartz, have been assisting in ensuring that businesses run smoothly through the strong development of these expectation management tools and behaviours. Call us today to assist you!

Contact

On Monday, Fair Work Australia finally laid down a decision that should have not been required in the first place.

Nearly a year and a half ago, a number of teenagers lost their after school jobs because of a clause within the General Retail Award which basically said a casual could not work for less than a 3 hour period.

For these teenagers, this effectively ruled out going to work after school as the time between school finishing and the retail outlet they worked in closing was less than 3 hours.

Now having restrictions on the minimum hours that can be worked is understandable.  In fact, to a certain extent, I support them.  However, when you are restricting the ability of teenagers to learn important work habits, then the law needs to be modified.  

Arguments from unions etc that easing this restriction would lead to "job losses" and "lower wages" did not really argue the primary point - that by enforcing this rule we were interfering with what is basically a vital learning area for our younger generations.  To suggest that allowing teenagers to work out of school hours was going to cost adults jobs just goes against the fact that most of those adults started exactly where these teenagers are now - with after school work!  Where did these adults learn the work habits that brought them to employment in later life if not in jobs such as these?

While it took 16 months and 3 rounds of arbitration to get there, this is a decision that should be congratulated. Despite the unions and government supporting the maintenance of the 3 hour limit, the tribunal has decided that provided a certain set of circumstances exist, a school aged person can work for less than a 3 hour period.

Under the new arrangements, school age persons can work a minimum of a 90-minute shift.  This will apply only if the employee is a full-time student; that the hours worked are between 3pm and 6.30pm on a school day; and the employee and their parent or guardian agrees on the shorter period. The shorter period is also allowed only if employment for a longer period is not possible because of the operational requirements of the employer or the unavailability of the student.

These arrangements are simple commonsense.  It is a pity it took so long to arrive at this decision!